Skip to main content

Is the flooring anti–dumping case a catalyst for change in the distribution channel?

David Wootton
Duties for Samling and 73 other respondents to the imported Chinese engineered flooring anti-dumping case were lowered Sunday. The Dept. of Commerce announced  they would lower Samling's rates from 10.88% to .29% and 73 other companies to 6.78%. The DOC's latest revisions mean that the largest volume manufacturers selling engineered wood to US importers have now been assigned rates close to zero. Jonathan Train, president of the Alliance for Free Choice and Jobs in Flooring (AFCJF) whose group opposed the investigation, is thrilled and feels vindicated. 

But does this mean it's over?  I am bothered by something more far reaching.

While many are focused on the the immediate outcome related to duties what is most significant to me is how it affects the fragile and contentious relationship between manufacturers and distributors – a problem we’ve been dealing with for twenty plus years and a topic that I’ve covered here before.

But I feel now that we are reaching a new stress point. The dynamic between the wood flooring distributor and manufacturer has been one with the potential for trouble for some time. That is because many distributors import Chinese products and include them into their own branded wood lines.  Those distributors also sell and distribute wood for U.S. manufacturers.  The manufacturers’ products may be domestically made or they could be Chinese imports that the manufacturer has placed within their branded programs.  This sets up a unique situation in which the distributor and manufacturer are competing against each other, possibly even with products from related sources. 

While this dynamic has been going on for years with comparatively silent if not benign friction, I think it is an untenable situation for both parties and I believe it is at the heart of the current litigation. The current hardwood flooring market has too much capacity and too many players  fighting over a shrinking market volume. Something’s gotta give! 

Will this anti-dumping case be a thorn that exacerbates the tenuous relationship and the catalyst that causes a major change in the distribution model?

My colleague, Jim Gould, recently wrote about how manufacturers must reach consumers through the most efficient and effective pathways and that the biggest threat to traditional distribution is complacency in believing that business will continue as usual. In his article Reaching the Consumer in a Changing Landscape, he says that if traditional distribution ceases being the most effective way to reach the consumer, manufacturers will have no choice but to take another path. I agree.

Will this mean that more manufacturers will start selling retail direct or even directly to consumers and will distributors focus more on imported lines as a way of maintaining their independence and future business?  One thing is certain  -  the manufacturer / distributor relationship has been under stress for a long while, the anti-dumping case is only adding to that stress. I think the relationship will become even more contentious and new changes in the model will take place. Certainly as a result of the threat to supply over the last few months importers of every kind are now more knowledgeable about sources of supply from other countries and can turn to alternative suppliers if necessary. They can probably also negotiate lower prices with their existing Chinese suppliers to help offset the impact of any final duties imposed.

I don’t mean to paint the distributor as the bad guy here.  At the root of this problem is a lack of aligned goals and a failure to work together and evolve as true channel partners. In too many cases, each channel partner is looking out for themselves creating conflicts that cannot possibly satisfy the needs of both parties and it merely perpetuates the problem.  I believe that all manufacturers have to be questioning the effectiveness of the traditional distribution channel and the ITC case is just one manifestation of that.

I am wondering if you think the same or have a different view of this?
As always thanks for reading this


David Wootton is President of The Wootton Group, an independent flooring consultancy, and a member of the Floor Covering Institute. He is past CEO of both Columbia Flooring and Harris-Tarkett.


Popular posts from this blog

Concrete Moisture Leading to Flooring Failures - Is this an Epidemic?

Sheet vinyl  lifting off concrete substrates that looks like blistered skin from a burn, wood flooring turning up at the edges, carpet tiles emitting foul odors from reactions with “wet” slabs.  All of these failures in floor covering occur daily around the country plaguing flooring contractors and end users.  Is this a flooring conspiracy or something more sinister?  Well, it’s not a conspiracy, nothing so colorful as that, and it’s not sinister unless you consider that moisture lurking in the substrates is skulking around waiting to pounce. What are the reasons for this outbreak of flooring failures?  Have adhesives changed?  Is flooring material different?  Hasn’t concrete been the same for years?  Why is this all happening now? Adhesives have changed from when solvent carriers were used but adhesives are actually better now.  Flooring products have changed with the onslaught of non-permeable backings which can trap moisture vapor emissions coming from concrete.  Concrete hasn’t

Intelligent merchandising in the floor covering showroom

Donato Pompo In a ceramic tile and stone showroom the two biggest challenges for customers are  visualizing how the tile or combination of tiles will look installed in the home and determining which tiles are suitable for their intended application. Figuring out how to address these two challenges should be a priority for every showroom. Along with that, conveying the features, benefits and limitations of the products is the next challenge. And perhaps the most important piece of the showroom puzzle, is to train sales people so they are knowledgeable and competent showroom consultants (I wrote about this previously on the blog in, How Training and E-learning Can Improve ROI ).   Years ago, when I was an importer and distributor with several showrooms I coined the term Intelligent Merchandising to represent the approach we developed to help our customers make selections and our sales people more effective in assisting our customers during the selection process. The challeng

Will Chinese Drywall VOC Issue Affect Flooring?

Chinese drywall shares commonalities with flooring, particularly as it relates to VOCs. If you’re new to the flooring industry you may be surprised to learn that last decade it was necessary for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to anoint carpet as a safe product . The proclamation was due to flawed tests perpetrated against the carpet industry by Anderson Laboratories . But the issue isn’t dead if you search the Internet. There are still sites that support Anderson Labs. Even a "green" industry site writes “ A rash of alleged health problems with carpet have yet to be properly explained, suggesting that all carpets, and especially the less expensive synthetics, should be used with great caution .” The drywall industry is going through a similar experience. Two major differences: 1. They’ve pinpointed it to some drywall made in China. 2. It’s true and real, and no one is suggested it isn’t destroying homes and p